Peer review Policy

All the manuscripts submitted to WJPS will be subjected to the double-blinded peer-review process:

• The manuscript will be reviewed by a minimum of two independent external experts in the respective subject area. The reports of all the reviewers will be considered while deciding on acceptance/revision or rejection of a manuscript.
  
  
• Editor-in-Chief will make the final decision, based on the reviewer’s comments.
  
  
• Editor-in-Chief can ask one or more advisory board members for their suggestions upon a manuscript, before making the final decision.
  
  
• Associate editor and review editors provide administrative support to maintain the integrity of the peer-review process.
  
  
• In case, authors challenge the editor's negative decision with suitable arguments, the manuscript can be sent to one more reviewer and the final decision will be made based upon his recommendations.